Are We Alone? My Take on the Fermi Paradox; A deep dive into a personal formula that explores the odds of finding cosmic neighbors.
8/9/20237 min read
The Loneliness Equation: A Personal Calculation for Our Place in the Cosmos
The question is as old as human consciousness. We gaze up at a velvet black sky, punctured by the diamond-sharp light of a billion distant suns, and we ask: Is anybody out there?
This profound sense of wonder is universal. Yet, it’s coupled with an equally profound silence. The universe, for all its apparent potential for life, has offered us no signs, no whispers, no cosmic hellos. This baffling contradiction—the high statistical probability of extraterrestrial life versus the complete lack of evidence for it—is famously known as the Fermi Paradox. It’s a puzzle that has captivated scientists, philosophers, and dreamers for decades. Where is everybody?
While some theories propose that we are a magnificent accident, a singular and unrepeatable miracle of biology in a sterile cosmos, my intuition has always rebelled against that idea. The sheer scale of it all—hundreds of billions of galaxies, each with hundreds of billions of stars—makes the notion of our solitude feel, for lack of a better word, improbable.
Driven by this conviction, I decided to embark on a personal journey. Not to solve the paradox definitively, but to grapple with its immense scale in a tangible way. I wanted to move beyond just wondering and start calculating. What follows is my own thought experiment, a formula designed to filter the unfathomable number of stars in our galaxy down to a more comprehensible figure: the potential number of worlds that could not only harbor life, but a civilization.
It’s a speculative endeavor, built on assumptions and estimations, but it’s an exercise that has helped me frame the silence not as an answer, but as a question that’s even more exciting. So, let’s run the numbers together.
The Galactic Filter: My 11-Step Formula for Finding E.T.
Our journey starts with the raw material of our galaxy, the Milky Way. We’ll begin with a conservative estimate of 250 billion stars and apply a series of eleven logical filters, each based on our current understanding of astronomy and biology, to see what remains.
Step 1: The Gift of Time (Star Lifetime) Complex life, as we know it, is a product of billions of years of slow, methodical evolution. It’s a process that cannot be rushed. Therefore, our first filter is time. A star must have a lifespan long enough for its planets to mature and for life to evolve from single cells to complex organisms. Based on Earth’s 4.5-billion-year journey, a star likely needs a lifespan of at least 10 billion years. This immediately rules out the massive, brilliant blue giants that burn hot and die young. We’re looking for the marathon runners, not the sprinters. Astronomers estimate about 20% of stars fit this bill.
250,000,000,000 stars * 0.20 = 50,000,000,000 qualifying stars
Step 2: A Place to Call Home (Planetary Systems) A star, no matter how stable, is useless without planets. Thankfully, modern exoplanet discoveries have shown us that planets are not the exception, but the rule. It seems most stars have a family of worlds orbiting them. We’ll take a conservative estimate that 95% of our long-lived stars host planetary systems.
50,000,000,000 stars * 0.95 = 47,500,000,000 planetary systems
Step 3: The Right Ingredients (Metal-Rich Stars) To build rocky, terrestrial planets like Earth, a star system needs a healthy supply of elements heavier than hydrogen and helium—what astronomers call "metals." These heavier elements are the building blocks of rock, iron cores, and life itself. A "metal-rich" star is therefore far more likely to form the kind of planets we’re looking for. Studies suggest about half of the stars in our vicinity are sufficiently metal-rich.
47,500,000,000 systems * 0.50 = 23,750,000,000 metal-rich systems
Step 4: The Cosmic Bouncers (Gas Giant Guardians) Our solar system has Jupiter and Saturn, colossal gas giants whose immense gravity acts as a cosmic shield, deflecting or absorbing countless asteroids and comets that would otherwise pummel the inner planets. This protection is crucial for long-term stability. I propose that a system needs two such guardians to be truly safe. This is a strict filter, and I estimate only about 16% of systems have this ideal configuration.
23,750,000,000 systems * 0.16 = 3,800,000,000 protected systems
Step 5: The "Goldilocks" Zone (Habitable Zone Planets) This is the famous concept of the region around a star where it’s not too hot and not too cold for liquid water to exist on a planet’s surface. Given water’s role as the universal solvent for life as we know it, this is non-negotiable. We’ll assume that 50% of our filtered systems have at least one rocky planet in this temperate zone.
3,800,000,000 systems * 0.50 = 1,900,000,000 potential planets
Step 6: The Elixir of Life (Liquid Water) Just because a planet is in the habitable zone doesn’t guarantee it has water. Mars is a good example. Looking at our own solar system, where Earth, Mars, and arguably Venus have been in the habitable zone at some point, we see that one out of three (Earth) definitely has abundant liquid water. To be generous, I'll estimate that 2 out of 3 planets in the zone have the potential for liquid water.
1,900,000,000 planets * (2/3) = ~1,267,000,000 water-possible planets
Step 7: The Life Support Systems (Necessary Conditions) A wet rock isn’t enough. A planet needs a suite of life-support systems. This includes active plate tectonics to recycle minerals, a magnetic field to deflect harmful solar radiation, and a substantial atmosphere to regulate temperature and pressure. And most crucially, it needs the spark of microbial life to begin oxygenating that atmosphere. I’ve bundled these enormous hurdles together and estimated that 66% of our candidate planets possess these features.
1,267,000,000 planets * 0.66 = ~836,220,000 life-ready planets
Step 8: The Rhythm of the Seasons (Axial Tilt) A planet’s tilt on its axis creates seasons. Seasons drive climate patterns, reproductive cycles, and the ebb and flow of resources. This dynamism is a powerful engine for evolution. Since all planets in our solar system have a tilt, I’ll assume 100% of our candidates do too.
836,220,000 planets * 1.0 = 836,220,000 planets
Step 9: The Stabilizing Anchor (A Large Moon) Earth’s large moon is a critical anchor. It stabilizes our axial tilt, preventing wild swings that would lead to catastrophic climate shifts over millennia. This stability is likely essential for complex life to evolve. A moon as large as ours relative to its planet is thought to be rare, likely the result of a cosmic collision. I place the odds at a very low 0.08%. This is one of the biggest filters in the equation.
836,220,000 planets * 0.0008 = ~668,976 planets
Step 10: A Manageable Day (The 24-Hour Day) The length of a day is surprisingly important. A day that is too long could lead to extreme temperature differences between the light and dark sides. A day that is too short might not provide enough time for certain biological processes. I estimate that a day length within a reasonable range (like our 24 hours) is beneficial, and that about 33% of planets would meet this criterion.
668,976 planets * 0.33 = ~220,762 planets
Step 11: The Crucible of Evolution (Extinction Events) This is my most paradoxical filter. Mass extinctions are devastating, but they are also powerful catalysts for evolution. They clear the board, allowing new, often more complex lifeforms to emerge. Too few extinctions, and life might stagnate in a "dinosaur phase." Too many, and the planet is sterilized. Earth has had five major events. I propose a "Goldilocks zone" of 2-8 events is ideal, and that about 33% of our remaining planets fall into this category.
220,762 planets * 0.33 = ~72,851 planets capable of harboring complex life
The Final Leap: From Life to Civilization
After eleven filters, we are left with over 72,000 planets in our galaxy that could, in theory, be home to complex life. But how many of those develop a civilization?
This is the most speculative leap of all. It’s possible that intelligence is the greatest filter, and that almost none of these worlds produce a species that builds, communicates, and organizes on a global scale. But my formula is based on the one data point we have: Earth. On our planet, complex life did lead to a technological civilization. If we assume we are not special, but average, then it’s conceivable that most, if not all, of these 72,851 worlds might eventually do the same.
And remember, our starting number of 250 billion stars was just an average. If we use the high-end estimate of 400 billion stars in the Milky Way, that number scales up to ~116,000 potential civilizations. If we use the low-end estimate of 100 billion, it drops to ~29,000.
Conclusion: Finding Hope in the Numbers
My calculations are a personal exercise in speculation. Each step is built on an assumption that could be wildly incorrect. But the final number, even at its lowest estimate, is what I find so staggering. It suggests that the potential for company in the cosmos is enormous.
This doesn't solve the Fermi Paradox. It deepens it. If there are tens of thousands of potential civilizations, where are they? Perhaps they are separated from us by vast gulfs of time, not just space—their empires rising and falling long before ours began. Perhaps they have no interest in broadcasting their existence. Or perhaps they are waiting, listening for a signal from a neighbor like us.
Ultimately, my formula doesn't give me a definitive answer. It gives me something better: a reason for continued optimism. It paints a picture of a galaxy teeming with potential, a cosmos filled with countless cradles of life. The silence we hear might not be the sound of emptiness, but the quiet of a vast and patient cosmic neighborhood, waiting to be explored. And the search, the exploration, and the continued asking of that age-old question will forever be one of humanity's greatest adventures.
Do you want to join the discussion? see this link - The Loneliness equation